OpenAI

Ran this? Answer two questions — did it work first try, and if not, which step broke — via the ic_vault_feedback_submit MCP tool or POST /api/vault/feedback. An entry with no answers has no rate, and that is the honest state, not a placeholder.

Offers

3 distinct offers under one brand name, each behind its own gate.

Who this is for

Comes bundled via partners; not a clean self-serve grant.

To have this checked against your own facts, call ic_vault_match. It answers in three values — you qualify, you do not, or we cannot tell from what the vendor publishes — and it will never report “you qualify” while any gate is unknown.

Traps

Every one of these cost real time. Ordered by how early they bite.

• T1 — Applying direct is the wrong move

  The credits are distributed BY partners. Getting into Ramp or Microsoft for Startups is the actual work; the OpenAI form is not the lever.

  Source: data/credits.ts OpenAI .value

• T2 — Both the amount and the mechanism were flagged uncertain

  `confidence: approx` here covers the delivery mechanism as well as the number — the entry's own note says "Amount and mechanism flagged uncertain in verification."

  Source: data/credits.ts OpenAI .note

Sources

• data/credits.ts — "OpenAI" .value (verbatim) data/credits.ts — ~$2,500 credits, distributed through partner programs (Ramp, Microsoft for Startups, certain VCs) rather than direct self-serve.
• data/credits.ts — "OpenAI" .note (verbatim) data/credits.ts — Amount and mechanism flagged uncertain in verification.
• CREDITS_META.lastUpdated — a lower bound on last_verified data/credits.ts — The file records 2026-07-07 as when the FILE was updated, not when this entry was individually re-checked.
• OpenAI — apply page ↗

Facts last re-checked 2026-07-07 (second-hand — verify before quoting). No material change observed since — which is not the same as none having happened.