Together AI

Ran this? Answer two questions — did it work first try, and if not, which step broke — via the ic_vault_feedback_submit MCP tool or POST /api/vault/feedback. An entry with no answers has no rate, and that is the honest state, not a placeholder.

Offers

3 distinct offers under one brand name, each behind its own gate.

Who this is for

Funding-stage gated (tiers). No equity, no age cap. Credits do NOT apply to Reserved GPU Clusters.

To have this checked against your own facts, call ic_vault_match. It answers in three values — you qualify, you do not, or we cannot tell from what the vendor publishes — and it will never report “you qualify” while any gate is unknown.

Traps

Every one of these cost real time. Ordered by how early they bite.

• T1 — Credits do NOT apply to Reserved GPU Clusters

  If your plan is a reserved cluster, these credits buy you nothing. Check what you intend to spend on before you size the tier.

  Source: data/credits.ts Together AI .eligibility

• T2 — The engineering hours are part of the award, not a bonus

  Build includes 3 engineering hours and Grow up to 10. `AwardForm` is single-valued, so the hours live in the tier summary only — do not drop them when quoting the tier.

  Source: docs/vault/SCHEMA.md § 9.11

Sources

• data/credits.ts — "Together AI" .value (verbatim) data/credits.ts — Tiered by funding: Build (<=$5M) up to $15K + 3 eng hrs; Scale ($5M-$10M) up to $30K; Grow (>$10M) up to $50K + up to 10 eng hrs. Plus GTM co-sell + VC network.
• CREDITS_META.lastUpdated — a lower bound on last_verified data/credits.ts — The file records 2026-07-07 as when the FILE was updated, not when this entry was individually re-checked.
• Together AI — apply page ↗

Facts last re-checked 2026-07-07 (from the source itself). No material change observed since — which is not the same as none having happened.